Who reviews this website
Dr. Arthur Burnett II, MD is a Physician. Dr. Arthur Burnett II, MD reviews this website in full: the product copy, the bottle, the ingredients, and every journal post before it is published. Nothing on this site ships until that review is done.
Dr. Arthur Burnett II, MD
Physician.
Reviews the content, the bottle, the ingredients and every post on this website.
Alpha Erec Official Website › About
About Alphaerecdaily, The Alpha Erec Retail Desk
Alphaerecdaily is the licensed U.S. retail desk for Alpha Erec, operating from New York. We are a distributor, not the manufacturer and not the formulator. We write these pages from the label, the vendor's own artwork and this desk's paperwork, cite published research for each botanical, and print \u201cnot published\u201d wherever a figure is withheld.
This page exists so a sceptical reader can audit the method in about ten minutes. Every claim in it is checkable against another page on this site.
Who publishes this Alpha Erec website
| Publisher | Alphaerecdaily |
|---|---|
| Role | Licensed U.S. retail desk — Alpha Erec |
| What that means | A distributor. Not the manufacturer, not the formulator, and not a clinic |
| Country | United States |
| Office | 222 Broadway, Suite 1901, New York, NY 10038 |
| Returns | 270 Lafayette Street, Suite 1203, New York, NY 10012 |
| Order support | +1 (720) 619-8477 · 7:00am–9:00pm, 7 days · [email protected] |
| Website desk | [email protected] · Mon–Fri 9:00am–5:00pm ET |
| Product | Alpha Erec, a chewable performance gummy for adult men |
| Current batch | Lot ALP-26/AL-8465, certificate reference ALP-8465-26-AL |
| Last reviewed | September 2026 |
We earn money when somebody buys through this website. Saying so first is the only honest order to say it in, and the rest of this page is about what we do to stop that interest shaping what is written.
How these Alpha Erec pages are written
- The label is the source, not the sales page Facts come from the printed panel, the vendor’s own listing artwork and this desk’s paperwork. Where the manufacturer’s marketing says more than the label supports, we print the label and name the difference. There are four such differences on this product and all four are set out on the ingredients page and the benefits page.
- “Not published” stays unpublished. No amount is published for any of the six botanicals in this product. We print that phrase rather than an estimate, six times over, on every page where the question arises.
- Sources are real, opened and linked inline Every PubMed identifier cited on this site was confirmed against the NCBI summary API before it was written, and every government page was opened in a browser. Citations appear in the body copy beside the claim they support, not only in a list at the foot.
- Corrections change the date We fix the page and move the review date forward. A review date that advances while the content sits still carries no information. Corrections go to [email protected].
- Named medical reviewer. ian has reviewed it. A fabricated credential on a health product is the most abused signal in this category, and a reader has no way to tell a real one from a false one. We use a named editorial desk with a method you can check instead.
Five places this site argues against its own Alpha Erec sale
The method above is only worth something if it is followed. Here are five specific places you can check it in a few minutes.
- We recommend the cheaper pack. The pricing page recommends three bottles rather than six, which is $87 less, because three bottles fits the guarantee arithmetic and six does not.
- We print the dose gap six times. The ingredients page sets the trial doses beside a column that reads “not published” for every botanical.
- We contradict our own supplier. The sales page claims eight clinically studied botanicals and 100 per cent natural ingredients. The panel names six and publishes no composition figure, and both pages say so.
- We publish the ingredient that fails. Tribulus terrestris is on the label and two systematic reviews say it does not raise testosterone. That is printed on the mechanism page rather than omitted.
- We publish a blog post that answers a buying question no. Alpha Erec is not an ED treatment exists because the name invites that question and the answer costs us sales.
Why Alpha Erec has two contact addresses
The order desk
+1 (720) 619-8477, 7:00am–9:00pm, 7 days, and [email protected]. Tracking, changes and refunds. This is the desk with access to the order system, and it is the one to telephone about anything involving money or a parcel.
The website desk
[email protected], Mon–Fri 9:00am–5:00pm ET. Pages, typos, corrections, privacy and press. This address cannot see orders. An email about a missing parcel sent here will be read by someone with no way to help, and it is the most common cause of a slow answer.
Both addresses, both postal addresses and the opening hours are printed in the footer of every page on this website, and again on the contact page with forms attached.
How this Alpha Erec website is kept current
A supplement site that never changes is either perfect or abandoned, and the second is far more common. Here is what actually gets reviewed and when.
| What | Reviewed | Trigger for a change |
|---|---|---|
| Prices and pack contents | Every site review | A change on the checkout page |
| Lot and certificate reference | Every site review | A new batch reaching this desk |
| The ingredient panel | Every site review | New label artwork from the manufacturer |
| Citations | Every site review | A link that no longer resolves, or a newer systematic review |
| Review statistics | Every site review | Updated figures from the distributor |
| Contact details and hours | Every site review | Any change at either desk |
| Corrections from readers | As received | Anything demonstrably wrong |
The review date at the foot of every page is September 2026. When a page changes substantively, that date moves. When nothing changes, it does not, which is the point: a date that advances on its own is decoration.
The Alpha Erec editorial policy on evidence
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses first. Where one exists for an ingredient, it outranks any individual trial, including a flattering one.
- Randomised controlled trials next. With the dose stated in the sentence, because the dose is usually the whole argument.
- Government and institutional sources for context. NIH, NCCIH, FDA and NIDDK pages are cited where a neutral summary is more useful than a single study.
- Never a citation we have not opened. Every PubMed identifier on this site was confirmed against the NCBI summary API, and every government page was opened in a browser rather than fetched by script, because several of those hosts refuse scripted requests in ways that look like a dead link.
- No animal or laboratory study presented as human evidence. Where the only evidence for an ingredient is preclinical, the page says so. Horny goat weed on the ingredients page is the clearest example.
Four things Alphaerecdaily is not
- Not the manufacturer. We do not formulate, blend or bottle this product, and we cannot change what is on the panel.
- Not a clinic. Nobody here can advise you on a symptom, a medication or a diagnosis. Those questions belong with a clinician or a pharmacist.
- Not an independent reviewer. We sell this product. Everything on this site should be read with that in mind, which is why the method above is stated rather than implied.
- Not a laboratory. We have not tested this product and we will not publish a certificate we have not seen. The quality page lists every assurance that is missing.
Alpha Erec sources cited on this page
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Questions and answers on dietary supplements. https://www.fda.gov/food/information-consumers-using-dietary-supplements/questions-and-answers-dietary-supplements
- National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements. Dietary supplements: what you need to know. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/WYNTK-Consumer/
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Dietary and herbal supplements. https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/dietary-and-herbal-supplements
- Qureshi A, Naughton DP, Petroczi A. A systematic review on the herbal extract Tribulus terrestris and the roots of its putative aphrodisiac and performance enhancing effect. J Diet Suppl. 2014;11(1):64-79. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24559105/
- Vilar Neto JO, de Moraes WMAM, Pinto DV, da Silva CA, Caminha JSR, Nunes Filho JCC, Reis CEG, Prestes J, Santos HO, Daher EF. Effects of tribulus (Tribulus terrestris L.) supplementation on erectile dysfunction and testosterone levels in men: a systematic review of clinical trials. Nutrients. 2025;17(7):1275. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40219032/
Every page, every journal post, the bottle facts and the ingredients go through review by Dr. Arthur Burnett II, MD before they ship. We write these pages from the Alpha Erec label, the vendor’s own listing artwork and this desk’s paperwork. We cite published research for every named botanical, and we print “not published” wherever a figure is not disclosed rather than estimating it. Where the manufacturer’s sales page claims more than the label supports, we say so on the page. The roundel beside this note is one of those cases: it says “Doctor Formulated” and names no clinician, so we treat it as a manufacturer’s statement about its own process. Corrections go to [email protected] and move the review date forward. Last reviewed September 2026 by Dr. Arthur Burnett II, MD.
Order Alpha Erec on the official website
A named desk, a telephone number answered seven days a week, a returns address in New York and a sixty-day window on every pack.
Six bottles at $49 each, $294 the lot
Order Alpha Erec On The Official WebsiteFree US shipping on the 3 and 6-bottle packs · 60-day money-back guarantee · lot ALP-26/AL-8465 · one-time payment, no subscription